Archive for ‘Legal Development’

January 15th, 2010

January Update – Riding the Cloud

by admin

This New Year, our heart goes out to the victims of the Haiti Disaster, what a way to begin the year. The death toll is said to be unimaginable and aid is barely trickling in. Haiti needs your help and your prayers. Read this for more information.

There has been a general outcry from Nigerians all around the world over the inclusion of Nigeria among the terrorist nations of the world. The argument is that one Mutallab does not a terrorist nation make. Then again, the fact remains that since the attempted bombing, we have not heard anything from the President about it. In law, silence is taken to be consent. Does that mean that the President condones the actions of the young man? We think it is more an issue of the President not being in any state to say anything about the fiasco. Which brings us to the question: why is the Vice President not acting for the President right now?

Apparently, this question has weighed heavily in the minds of most right-thinking Nigerians, especially as the President by his long absence, is in direct contravention of the constitutional provision contained in Sections 5 (1) and 148 (1) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. Bowing under the pressure of several civic groups and patriotic minded Nigerians, including the Nigerian Bar Association, a High Court in Abuja finally granted the Vice President the power to exercise the functions of the President as delegated to him by the President. What does that mean? Though the words seem a bit vague, they in essence mean that the Vice President cannot act in his own initiative but only to the extent that the President allows him to. As preposterous as this is, we can only wait and watch how Vice President Goodluck handles himself.

Cloud computing seems to be the rage these days. Basically, cloud computing is about storing your data on a drive somewhere in the ‘cloud’. Once you have connection to the internet, you have your data. Goodbye external harddrives, goodbye USB flash drives and who cares if the computer crashes? Or at least that is supposed to be the general attitude. However, I have no idea how this will impact on everyday legal practice in terms of security and privacy of data. Can you really put your client’s confidential data out there in the ’sky’ and be sure of it’s safety? Do you even want to take the risk? With Google, one of the lead providers of cloud computing threatening to pull out of China because of restrictions and hacking…yes, hacking, it makes one a bit sceptical. Just recently, Gmail, Google’s mail provider was hacked into; the safety and security of the Cloud remains to be seen.

Writing on security, are you a facebooker and are you worried about your privacy on facebook? Check back here for 5 Tips to keep you secure and private on facebook.

As this is the first month of the year (and the first post), something needs to be said about goal-setting. Too many legal practitioners treat their practice like it is a hobby. If your legal practice is not your primary source of income, then it is alright to treat it that way. But if it is where you pay the bills from, some perception reorganization and prioritizing needs to take place. What would you like to achieve in 2010? How would you go about achieving these? That is Goal Setting. Be realistic in your expectations and do not be afraid to go for what you want.

Thank you for being a true companion. If you have not yet done so, please subscribe to our feed. We love hearing from you, so please keep the comments coming.

Have a lovely weekend!

Send article as PDF to Create PDF

December 18th, 2009

Seyi Akinwunmi: On the Recession and other Matters

by admin

seyi-akinwunmi

You are known as the foremost Insolvency and Bankruptcy practitioner in Nigeria. What got you interested in this area of practice? And what did you do to become the expert that you are today?

I got in by coincidence. I have always thought about buying businesses, adding value and selling for profit; for some reason I have always thought about that for ages and I didn’t know what it entailed or anything. But one day when I started out practice I did a receivership matter for NIDB and found it extremely interesting. I did about three more of those sometime in 1987 and that was it. Suddenly when we started Akinwumi & Busari we got a call from UBA trustees asking us to get an injunction for them on a matter which turned out to be an insolvency matter – a very big receivership. The original plan was to get an injunction but the matter sort of grew up to 17 cases in court. It included meetings with trade unions, workers, polices, insurance, the whole gamut. And we’ve been doing that matter in one way or the other for over 10 years. That matter itself was with regard to 5 star industries and acting for UBA Trustees – trustees to 17 banks. It was an MA in insolvency for me and boiled my interests and revived my earlier thoughts on business. Since then I have been involved in one way or the other in over 200 insolvency matters.

With the present economic climate, a lot of young lawyers would be interested in Insolvency and Bankruptcy practice. What do they have to do or what particular qualifications are necessary to be an Insolvency Lawyer?

At the moment, the law allows anybody to practise insolvency, except those excluded specifically by law – the legally underage, insane, and bankrupt. Therefore there isn’t any specialization yet. My advice would be that they equip themselves with the law of secured credit because that is at the heart of insolvency. We are hoping as an association (BRIAPAN) to start workshops and training sessions in the next few years we believe we will be in a position where we can organise pre-qualification exams for young persons who want to leave school and become insolvency practitioners whether they are lawyers or not as happens in other jurisdictions At the moment they could come to our workshops or do a Masters in secured credit.

By the way, The Law Event is going to organise later in the year, a course or programme known as “So You want to specialize” and the idea is that various specialist lawyers could talk to young lawyers about how to specialize in veracious fields. There would be Insolvency practitioners there who would also speak about insolvency.

Could you please give a brief description of what insolvency and bankruptcy is all about?

In brief, insolvency essentially in the case of corporate insolvency is pretty straight forward in Nigeria because that’s what most people know. This is where an individual (corporation) is unable to meet its financial obligations and therefore in the case of an individual is deemed bankrupt and in a corporation insolvent. In some jurisdictions, bankruptcy is used to describe both but in the UK there’s that differentiation.

The bankruptcy law in Nigeria is quite elaborate and what doesn’t make it work is not just the law itself which obviously needs some tweaking, but more of the culture and the reluctance of those that are in the position to declare people bankrupt to do so. This has a lot to do with our culture and the extended family system. With corporate insolvency it is much easier because for one, you owe and the person being owed has no problem demanding for wind up.

The Company’s and Allied Matters Act (CAMA) says that if a company cannot pay N2, 000.00 (Two Thousand Naira) 21 days after a demand letter has been written, you can file a petition for winding up.

However, there are various indices from various jurisdiction and various schools of thought of what actually depicts a company as insolvent. For example, a negative balance sheet might say a person is insolvent but it may not be so; it might just be like in the case of many banks, that there’s a provision for bad loans. This doesn’t mean they cannot survive.

It could also be seen when a company is downsizing. Most people think that the fact that a Company is downsizing and letting people go means that company is insolvent but it might just be restructuring. The initial definition above was the law but it could also be used to describe other situations.

In your many years as a Bankruptcy and Insolvency Practitioner, there must have been quite a number of opportunities and challenges. Could you share some with us?

The opportunities have been essentially for me, the knowledge I have garnered and the people I have met. I have met numerous people in this job who have been beneficial to me; I wouldn’t like to mention the clients but I’ll mention 3 people, practitioners who I’ve learnt a lot from: Prince Adesubo Adetona; Prince Babington Ashaye; and Mr. Tunde Ajayi – the last one is actually an accountant and a lawyer and is my contemporary. We’ve done a lot of work together. The other 2 have been my mentors in this field of practice.

Challenges… where do I start from? I’ve had a gun to my head by the police; I’ve had a gun to my head by the owner of a company; been locked up in company premises for 24 hours; have had to learn how to deal with extreme fraudsters, and I mean EXTREME fraudsters. The challenges really have been in the latter years, with some of my clients and I have had to convince them that there is a point to restructuring instead of selling off assets. A challenge in convincing them of the need to pay all staff their entitlements before it gets to the financial institutions. I am glad to say that I have succeeded in convincing those with the guns to put their guns down; those locking me up to negotiate and banks to restructure.

The greatest problem I have encountered has been a very sad one, where through no fault of ours, there was a death at the company when one of the buildings collapsed and killed a worker. Luckily for us, we had not even taken over the premises.

Has the recent economic meltdown created more work for you?

I wonder why everybody asks that; to answer your question not necessarily. It has not created more work because there’s always been. What it has created is a new avenue of work for practitioners. This means that a lot more companies are willing to come forward and seek help; they don’t wait for the bank to take them over. So to that extent there has been a new avenue. But even the banks now are a bit wary of taking over companies and winding down; but there has been more awareness.

In October of 2008, the Legal Services Bill in the UK gained Royal assent creating the Alternate Business Structure (ABS), which allowed for the creation of multi-disciplinary legal services firms. This is a huge break from the traditional method of practising law. Do you think this is a threat to the law practice and do you foresee duplication in the Nigerian legal system?

It does threaten the profession because where you are going is the dilution of the profession, probably ultimately leading to its non existence as we know it today. The opportunities there are that you are able to go to a one-stop shop and get all your services. I personally do not think it is a good thing. I think that lawyers should be lawyers and accountants should be accountants – those are the two professions that are likely fused – you are not likely to get a doctor with a lawyer except in medical negligence. I think competencies will be diffused. The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has resisted and I think they should do more to resist otherwise what happens to the Forty Thousand lawyers and our traditions? A firm which is fused will lose so many of the traditions which distinguish us as lawyers.

You are very passionate in canvassing for better legal support services in Nigeria. It is obvious that we are lacking support services for legal practitioners in various areas but could you mention one area that is particularly glaring to you and the overall effect on legal practise in Nigeria?

The main areas I see are development of the young lawyer. I’ve always thought from the first day I started practice after Law School that the Law School is inadequate. Therefore it is not by coincidence that we have pupilage in the UK. But since we don’t have that here, it is imperative that we have support services to teach the Young Lawyer what the practice of law entails. This is why the Law Events positions itself to have successful young lawyers’ trainings for mentoring.

The second area is in recruitment: a lot of time, lawyers are recruited by word of mouth and because I know the person’s father or brother, I employ him. The bigger law firms have tried to fashion out a way of interviewing and selecting but there is no formal recruitment agency that knows the need of lawyers and appreciates what is required; an agency that will also promote mergers and help with business management or management of the law firm or legal dept as a business. These areas are very fundamental because the strength of the profession is with the youth. We need more people to get involved in this.

The Law Events is an organization which offers support services to legal practitioners. What is the philosophy behind this and of what benefit is it to the young lawyer?

LE is a service company who work professionally to support the profession. One of our main focus is the Young Lawyer; we believe we need to empower, educate and strengthen the Young Lawyer in order to strengthen the profession. While we are supporting the professional we are focused a great deal on developing and training the young lawyer.

Currently we have no mega law firm in Nigeria; however, we do have some really big firms. What hope is there for the Solo Practitioner? Is the role of the Solo Practitioner gradually being eroded by these bigger law firms?

First there is no mega law firm in Nigeria. At all. I had a meeting with a law firm in the UK – White & Case a few weeks ago and in that premises alone, I think they had over 400 lawyers. The month before that I was in New York and White & Case occupied almost a whole building. I suspect they have offices in no less than eight other countries. Those are mega law firms so I don’t think we have any in Nigeria yet and it might not happen for a very long time. However we have bigger law firms by consolidation and partnerships.

There’s room for the solo because not everyone can afford the big firms. Their overhead makes their fees quite high and as a result their focus is different. One man who works as a bartender somewhere and needs to file a divorce petition – someone must do it for him. Someone must deal with the smaller issues. I think that there are various phases. The solo is a crucial aspect of the practice of law. However I think we need to grow the economy so that it can take mega law firms. There are economic and cultural limitations.

I noticed that Akinwumi & Busari is quite technologically forward, which isn’t the case with a number of law firms in Nigeria. With huge online libraries like Lexis Nexis, the internet plays an increasingly important role in effective law practise. How far behind, technologically are we in Nigeria and what should be done to help lawyers keep in tandem with global practices?

Frankly, I’m not very confident to talk about practice generally because I don’t poke into other people’s offices and many other places I go to are like mine. I went to an office a few months ago, an older lawyer who insisted we had a meeting in his office and it reminded me of an office where I did my holiday job about twenty six or twenty seven years ago where you have the main principal’s office which is bigger than the rest of the office, filled with a lot of files and a secretary with a type writer. I could not believe that in 2009 that would happen but apparently it does. Many people didn’t seem as surprised when I told them about it.

Even those of us who have these tools are not up to scratch. Recently I was teaching one of my colleagues, a respected lawyer how to mark up and make comments on a document without having to first print it. He later sent me a text message and this was what he said:

“Thanks Seyi for your training last week, I have since been able to mark up my amendments and make comments on docs without having to first print them; it has revolutionalized my lifestyle. Thanks again.”

A lot of people have computers in their office but don’t know how to use them. Most lawyers can use words. The Law Events has also assisted in training and Odade Publishers of Lexis Nexis have been very involved in training Lawyers how to research on the internet. I’ve been on that training and recommend it for all lawyers.

You seem to be a very social sort of person; open and friendly. Could you give us a glimpse into the real Seyi Akinwunmi, the man behind the lawyer?

With me, I think I work very hard but I also play quite hard and I’m an ardent football fan (a Man – U fanatic). I’m a music buff and into all genres of music except classical music and Kanye West. I love dancing. I don’t go out as much as I used to. You say I’m a social person, and yes, I have a lot of friends and socialize a lot but only when I feel like. I’m the kind of person who makes sure I go to a wedding, spend only 20 minutes but makes sure I see the couple. I am very friendly and averse to snobs. I do not like lawyers calling me SIR – especially lawyers because I believe we are all colleagues. I think I’m pretty straightforward. I try to be thorough in all my work; always willing to try out new frontiers. I see the law as a business and not a social calling. I’m married with 3 children – 2 beautiful girls and 1 handsome boy – like his father.

Finally, what is the one technological gizmo you absolutely cannot do without?

None. I hate the thought of an addiction of any kind. But if I am to pick a gadget I’d rather not live without, maybe my television during the football season

spotlight-Akinwunmi

Send article as PDF to Create PDF

November 23rd, 2009

Legal Blogs: The Nigerian Phenomenon

by admin

In the past two decades, blogs have almost completely taken over the World Wide Web. Most internet users find themselves going to blogs for information and articles on practically any topic as there are niche blogs in virtually every field. This explosive revolution has swept through every region of the world from Addis Ababa to Zurich.

Browsing through the internet in search of legal blogs from Africa, it is interesting to note that those coming out of Nigeria are pretty non-existent. Compared with countries such as Egypt, South Africa and Kenya, the indication is disheartening. The paradox lies in the fact that as of June 2009, Nigeria had the second largest number of online users, next to Egypt (www.internetwolrdstats.com). With over 40,000 qualified legal practitioners, it becomes a little mystifying why there is such a dearth of legal blogs coming out of Nigeria. A number of factors are responsible for this.

The rapid development of internet technology is a major factor. Even though Nigerians spend a lot of time on the internet, many have not evolved beyond the use of emails, Chat Rooms and a handful of websites although with the popularity of facebook, quite a number have made the migration to social networks. Nevertheless, blogging remains shrouded in obscurity.

Needless to say, there are a lot of lawyers in Nigeria who are internet savvy and some who have even delved into the world of web development but are still ignorant of the workings of blogs. Because they have no idea how a blog works or where the advantages of blogging lie, they have developed little interest in the blogosphere as a whole. This laissez-faire attitude has contributed far more to the near absence of legal blogs in Nigeria.

When all is said and done though, there are a few legal blogs around, although not enough to adequately represent the legal profession in Nigeria — but as the Nigerian Bar Association has gone digital, it might not be long before its members follow suit.

Written by Sharon Famonure

As Published in the Nigerian Lawyers Association (NLAs) 10th Anniversary Commemorative Publication

Send article as PDF to Create PDF

September 2nd, 2009

No More Senior Advocates of Nigeria (SAN)

by admin
No More Senior Advocates of Nigeria (SAN)

That was the hue and cry at the Annual General Conference of the Nigerian Bar Association. It was a proposition that was slipped in at every opportunity. To understand the depth and intensity of this cry and the resulting reaction, an appreciation of the rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) is necessary.

The Conferment of the rank of SAN sprung up as an equivalent to the Queens Counsel of England. The first lawyers to be conferred with the rank were Chief Fredrick Rotimi Alade Williams and Bekinbo Graham-Douglas in 1975, which was when the rank was established.

The rank is conferred by the Privileges Committee and is awarded to lawyers who are 10 years or more at the bar. However, conferment is not automatic and since it is a privilege, the rank is not one that is of right; in other words, no one has the right to be conferred with the rank of SAN. Certain conditions need to be met, such as the number of cases handled and the number of Court of Appeal and Supreme Court appearances, to mention just a few and even at that, conferment is totally at the discretion of the Privileges Committee.

Once a lawyer has been conferred with the rank of SAN, he/she becomes a silk wearing member of the Bar. This comes with quite a number of privileges some of which are the right to be heard out of turn at Court and the best seats in Court. One other indirect privilege the holder of the rank enjoys is the best and more lucrative cases are usually for the picking.

So one might ask, why would lawyers wish to eradicate such an honourable icon of accomplishment? There may be several reasons for the abolition of the rank of SAN, but the loudest was the method of conferment. Since the conferment is solely at the discretion of the Privileges Committee, there is obviously little transparency about it all. The general opinion seemed to be that less deserving lawyers were being so honoured while earnest, hard working and deserving lawyers were being overlooked, despite countless applications. There were murmurs and words such as ‘politicizing‘ and ‘cartels‘ were bandied about. The call for the abolishment of the rank became so heated that the President of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) at the recently concluded Annual General Conference (AGF) had to institute a technical committee to investigate the call and report to the National Executive Council (NEC), the ultimate decision making organ of the NBA.599375_wigs

What would such a move, should the NEC act on it, mean for legal tradition? Apart from the obvious halt of a thirty-plus-year tradition, the younger lawyers would be the most affected. It would mean for some, the draining of a legal wellspring of inspiration. There are some law students who from their first year at university, dedicated their toils and candlelit vigil over tomes to the eventual donning of silk. What would the abolition of the rank mean to their hopes and dreams? What becomes the determinant of excellence in the legal profession? Not to say that the rank of SAN right now is the sole determinant of excellence in the profession, but there is the presumption of excellence which comes with the silk robe. Is abolition really the answer or should we focus more on reformation?

In the interest of public opinion, please share yours by voting using the poll at the top of the right sidebar.

Update:

Voting is now closed.

Send article as PDF to PDF

No More Senior Advocates of Nigeria (SAN)
July 30th, 2009

Goodbye House of Lords | News | The Lawyer

by admin

Goodbye House of Lords | News | The Lawyer. As of today, 30th July, 2009, the UK House of Lords ceases to exist as we know it. This was published by The Lawyer.com.

For those who trained in Common Law jurisdictions (like I did), the House of Lord is sacrosanct; or at least, we were taught to view it that way. So it is easy to understand the nostalgia which accompanied my reading of the news. While we are advocating change and progress and maybe an eradication of excess traditionalism in the law profession, this comes as a shock. Is there such a thing as too much change?

The House of Lords had their last sitting today. What we now have, is a Supreme Court. What can we say? Change IS a constant.

If you are not sure, this is the home of Ryland v Fletcher (the doctrine of strict liability); Dunlop Pn.eumatic Tyre v. Selfridge and co Ltd (privity of contract); Donoghue v. Stevenson (the neighbour principle); Hedley Byrne v Heller (liability for pure economic loss), just to mention a few.

This a YouTube video by Lord Justice Mance explaining the reason for the change.

We here at The Nigerian Lawyer would like to give our last bow to the House of Lords and the great Justices who sat in it. Adieu!

Send article as PDF to PDF Creator

June 13th, 2009

Making Partnerships Work: The Internet as a Law Office

by admin

I came to Transcorp Hilton for the 4th Business Law Conference of the Nigerian Bar Associations’ Section on Business Law full of expectations; secure in the knowledge that I would get the opportunity to network in a big way and also learn new ways of making the marriage between Law and Technology more seamless and less stressful. The first surprise I got was at the Sponsored stands. There were at least two Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) providers with their stands, ready to do business. That should not be shocking as SaaS seems to be the new facebook. However, this is Nigeria, so my shock may be excused. I do believe though, that the timing is more than just coincidence as I had been looking into SaaS the week before. Let me share some of my findings with you.

Webopedia defines SaaS as a delivery method that provides access to software and its functions remotely as a Web-based service. SaaS allows organizations to access business functionality at a cost typically less than paying for licensed software since SaaS pricing is based on a monthly fee. In simple English, SaaS is a complete office. Online. A partnership between technology and management. As a Law Office, it provides everything from Case Management, to File Storage and even litigation support. SaaS is the lawyer’s IT nirvana. The beauty of this service is that no additional hardware is needed, software licensing fees are more or less eliminated and it is much cheaper than paying an in-house IT person or firm.

There are two forms of SaaS; it may either be in the form of software which is installed in your computer or software hosted on the internet, in which case you have a freer hard drive.

As magnificent as SaaS sounds, it has been greeted with a lot of suspicion and reservation. This is not entirely unfounded. We are talking about Law, one of the world’s most (if not the world’s most) conservative professions; one in which the principle of client confidentiality is sacrosanct. The lawyer is the custodian of the client’s secrets. The internet was not created with security of information in mind; what happens if a client’s file is hacked? These are questions that are still being answered.

Nevertheless, the advantages far outweigh the disadvantages as the question of breach of client confidentiality is still that of supposition. If you are not comfortable with SaaS on the internet like the services offered by NetDocuments.Com, your practise might want to explore SaaS installed in your computer. It is a hassle free, more organized and environmentally friendly way of practising the legal profession.

Send article as PDF to Create PDF

October 17th, 2008

How the Traditional Role of Lawyers will Change

by Sharon Famonure

After years of talking with a wide variety of lawyers, I have found that many practitioners have one thing in common: they seem to want to deny that they are, well, lawyers. They downplay the legal content of their jobs.Private client lawyers (for example, those who advise on divorces or draft wills) tell me that their job is not really about the law; rather, they insist, they are experienced counsellors, confidantes, therapists even, in whom their clients have unwavering faith in relation to their personal problems.

In similar vein, litigators say that their primary role in life is that of project manager rather than provider of legal advice; corporate lawyers claim to be deal-makers and negotiators much less than legal draftsmen; capital market lawyers suggest they are transaction managers rather than gurus of finance law; in-house lawyers maintain they are risk managers more than legal counsellors; banking lawyers assert their clients come to them not for legal advice but for their market knowledge; and high street solicitors insist that they rarely undertake legal research. Even judges say that they are becoming . . . case managers.

Where have all the lawyers gone? Why are lawyers not undertaking the rarefied legal work that our law schools led us to expect (and many still do)?

A variety of reasons might be advanced for lawyers denying they are lawyers. One response might be that being a lawyer is, bluntly, not the coolest of jobs, and perhaps not as prestigious as once it was. There may even be a stigma of sorts attached to being a lawyer – hence the wealth of lawyer jokes. And so, in response, lawyers might be holding themselves out as belonging, at least in part, to another discipline.

I do not accept this line of thought. It may be that the ill-informed and the disconnected will trash the legal profession but in most walks of life lawyers remain well respected. In any event, I cannot imagine according to what scale it is cooler or more prestigious to be, say, a project manager than a lawyer, with all due respect to project managers.

It may be that lawyers often genuinely forget how much they know about the law and so do not regard themselves as especially lawyerly. Or perhaps they do not feel that it is their legal knowledge that differentiates them in the marketplace and so they point to complementary skills of which they are proud.

There is something different here, I believe, from yesteryear’s traditional role of the lawyer as the “man of affairs”, the all-purpose rock of an adviser upon whom clients could unfailingly rely. That old boy (and these chaps were invariably male) regarded the law, in contemporary jargon, as their core competence, around which they built more general business acumen.

In contrast, the modern lawyer, who is in denial of being lawyerly, seems to want argue that they have some different core competence and relegate their legal ability to the background or periphery. I believe this is an indicator of profound forces at play, forces that are lessening the need for the traditional “black letter” lawyer. When it becomes possible to standardise, systematise, package and even commoditise the law, the need for the traditional bespoke handling by the conventional lawyer lessens considerably.

Lawyers’ denial of their lawyerliness is an early but crucial indicator that they can sense there is less purely legal work to be done and so they are beginning to adapt. Whether they are fully conscious of this phenomenon or not, in order to survive, many are widening their range of skills, broadening their sphere of impact, and are anxious that the world does not pigeon hole them as detached analysts who sit in ivory towers. Most lawyers, in other words, can no longer eke a living from the law alone. >>>more.

Richard Susskind is Emeritus Professor of Law at Gresham College, IT adviser to the Lord Chief Justice and consultant to leading law firms. He was awarded an OBE in 2000. This is an extract from his forthcoming book, The End of Lawyers? Rethinking the Nature of Legal Services. For more information click here

Send article as PDF to PDF

October 5th, 2008

A Wiki Of Nigerian Law?

by Sharon Famonure

A wiki is a software which allows a group of users to freely add and edit articles on any subject. Wiki.Org defines a wiki as “a piece of server software that allows users to freely create and edit Web page content using any Web browser.” Wikipedia is probably the most successful wiki on the web.

One of the earliest legal wikis was created by Sun Microsystems in 2007; Between January and the start of September, there had been 1,200 articles published internally at Sun (Niraj Chokshi). In-house departments and Law Firms have begun using wikis. It is an effective method of publishing and keeping track of articles emanating from that law firm or in-house department.

Nigerian Wiki is probably the only Nigerian wiki available on the internet – if there are others, please let me know. Nigeria has a number of Law Firms and in-house departments; Legal Practitioners and Law students. Why can’t we come together and produce a wiki of Nigerian law? Any Lawyer could write an article on any aspect of Nigerian law and publish on the wiki; others would be able to edit and add to it until an authoritative position is produced on that area of law.

Think about it and if you are interested, please let me know. You could either leave a comment here, or send a mail to me at sharon {dot} famonure {at} gmail {dot} com.

Send article as PDF to PDF

October 3rd, 2008

The Future of Law and The End of Lawyers

by Sharon Famonure

One of the problems with being an author who makes predictions is that, eventually, you can be called to account. With the benefit of hindsight, critics can expose the misconceptions and the naiveties. Or, much less likely, they can confirm that the vision has been fully realised.In my book, The Future of Law, published in 1996, I made many predictions. When judging that book, however, commentators often overlook the fact that the view of the legal world set out there was a 20-year view. I was speculating about changes from 1996 to 2016 (give or take). Today, we are just past the half-way point of the 20-year transition and so it is still a little early to assert that I was right or wrong. That said, I think it worth saying that I remain committed to that book’s central themes and that we are on course for many of the fundamental changes I anticipated.

Perhaps the most crucial line of thought was that we were witnessing what I called a change in the “information substructure” in society. I used this term to refer to the dominant means by which information is captured, shared and disseminated within society. I observed, as some anthropologists have, that you can see that human beings have travelled through four phases in relation to information substructure: the first being the era of orality, where communication was dominated by speech; thereafter the era of script; then came print; and then, and we were in that transition then (and still are), into the fourth stage – of the world of information technology.

My next point, and I still strongly believe this, is that the information substructure in society – this dominant means by which information is captured, shared and communicated – dictates to a large extent the quantity of our law, the complexity of our law, the regularity with which our law can change, and those who are able to advise upon it and be knowledgeable about it.If we look at the way the law has changed throughout history, we can see transitions as the information substructure has changed. I argued that there was going to be a shift in legal paradigm (although now the notion of “paradigm” is rather overused). By this I meant that many of our fundamental assumptions about the nature of legal service and the nature of legal process would be challenged by the coming of information technology and the internet. In other words, much that we had always taken for granted in the past, about the way that lawyers work and the way non-lawyers receive legal guidance, would change through technology.

I also identified a phenomenon that I introduced as the “technology lag”. This was a lag between two forms of technology: data processing and knowledge processing. Data processing is our use of technology to capture, distribute, reproduce and disseminate information. We have become extremely adept at this. Indeed, everyone who bemoans the information overload that affects all of us will say we have become too good at data processing. But now, knowledge processing is coming to the rescue.This is a set of technologies that helps us analyse, sift through and sort out the mountains of data that we have created and helps make them more manageable. Data processing has advanced well ahead of knowledge processing, but the gap between the two – the technology lag – is going to close. When it closes, we will be fully in the information society.

I believe now, and I believed then, that we are in a transitional phase between the print-based industrial society and the IT-based information society. Only when knowledge-based technologies allow us to manage more effectively these mountains of data we have created, will we be fully in the information society.

I talked also of the “latent legal market”, and this attracted a lot of interest. This was the notion that many people in their social and in their working lives need legal help and would benefit from legal guidance but lack the resources, or perhaps simply the courage, to secure legal counsel from lawyers. I believe things have changed: on the internet we now have vast resources available to people who, from the Government’s 2,500 websites or the innumerable voluntary legal services sector websites, can obtain practical, punchy legal guidance. I believe there is not just a latent legal market for the ordinary citizen but also for major organisations, too, when they find it difficult to secure legal guidance on all those occasions when they need it. All of this led me to speak about access to justice – not in the sense that Lord Woolf, the former Lord Chief Justice, was then speaking of access to justice, when he referred to improved access and greater access to dispute resolution – but in a broader sense. I had in mind the notion that as citizens we should be able to find out easily and quickly what our legal entitlements are, and in so doing, we should be able to avoid legal disputes. >>>more.

Richard Susskind is Emeritus Professor of Law at Gresham College, IT adviser to the Lord Chief Justice and consultant to leading law firms. He was awarded an OBE in 2000. This is an extract from his forthcoming book, The End of Lawyers? Rethinking the Nature of Legal Services. For more information click here

Send article as PDF to PDF Download

September 19th, 2008

Law In The Modern World: Obsolete Or Innovative?

by Sharon Famonure

The recent years have witnessed the near complete arrogation of traditional ways of conducting business, by the rapid metamorphosing of Information Technology (IT). In Nigeria, the giant leap has been made from the long queues synonymic with the bureaucratic process to online filings and registrations. The times are rapidly changing.

In view of this, it is necessary, if not mandatory to examine the role of the lawyer in the immediate and distant future. What is the future for law practise as we know it today? This is the basis of the six part draft excerpt from Richard Susskind’s book, The End of Lawyers? Rethinking the Nature of legal services. He explains in the first draft that his aim is “… to explore the extent to which the role of the traditional lawyer can be sustained in coming years in the face of challenging trends in the legal marketplace and new techniques for the delivery of legal services.”

This is the spirit behind THE NIGERIAN LAWYER. Times are a changing and legal practitioners need to change with it. Law practise as we know it may not exist in the years to come. In order to remain relevant as lawyers, new approaches to practising law need to be explored. Richard Susskind puts it succinctly:

“…for all lawyers to introspect, and to ask themselves, with their hands on their hearts, what elements of their current workload could be undertaken differently – more quickly, cheaply, efficiently, or to a higher quality – using alternative methods of working. In other words, the challenge for legal readers is to identify their distinctive skills and talents, the capabilities that they possess that cannot, crudely, be replaced by advanced systems or by less costly workers supported by technology or standard processes, or by lay people armed with online self-help tools.

I will argue that the market is increasingly unlikely to tolerate expensive lawyers for tasks (guiding, advising, drafting, researching, problem-solving and more) that can equally or better be discharged, directly or indirectly, by smart systems and processes. It follows that the jobs of many traditional lawyers will be substantially eroded and often eliminated. At the same time, I foresee new law jobs emerging which may be highly rewarding, even if very different from those of today.”

(Read the whole article here).

Insisting on the undeviating practise of traditional law will, without a doubt, render such a practitioner obsolete and inapposite in the years to come. The solution, if Lawyers seek continued relevance not just in cases involving complex legalities is to bring to bear innovative and creative methods to the legal practise.

Richard Susskind is Emeritus Professor of Law at Gresham College, IT adviser to the Lord Chief Justice and consultant to leading law firms. He was awarded an OBE in 2000. This is an extract from his forthcoming book, The End of Lawyers? Rethinking the Nature of Legal Services.

Send article as PDF to Create PDF


AWSOM Powered